Resilient by Design

Copenhagen, Denmark's capital, is widely recognized as a global leader in sustainability. In 2024, it was ranked third in the Arcadis Sustainable Cities Index, highlighting its commitment to environmental initiatives and urban resilience. Additionally, Copenhagen was designated as the UNESCO-UIA World Capital of Architecture for 2023, celebrating its rich architectural heritage and innovative urban design.

A few weeks ago, I traveled to this remarkable city as part of a Circularity Delegation organized by Circular San Antonio (https://www.circularsanantonio.org/). The goal? To see how Copenhagen is embedding sustainability into city life—not as a buzzword, but as a core operating principle. As a consultant at BranchPattern, I’m deeply passionate about exploring how different cultures and international perspectives shape sustainable design and human experience. Our firm works across borders, collaborating on projects both in the U.S. and abroad, and we believe that learning from diverse approaches enriches our ability to guide clients toward more thoughtful, resilient solutions. Supporting this trip was an opportunity not only to broaden my own perspective but also to bring back lessons from Copenhagen’s unique culture—lessons that can inspire new possibilities for sustainable real estate here at home.

What I found wasn’t just a list of impressive projects or policies (though there were plenty). It was something harder to put into bullet points—a culture that designs for trust, invests in resilience, and builds from a deep belief that communities can shape their future.

Lessons from Copenhagen

Over the course of the week, we were immersed in a series of sessions, presentations, and on-the-ground tours that left a deep impression — not just with what we saw, but with the values that ran beneath it all.

I could probably write a book about all of the takeaways I walked away with, but in the spirit of keeping this digestible over your morning coffee, here are a few of the moments and ideas that stuck with me:

‍

In Copenhagen, public design reflects public trust.

Playgrounds open into plazas. Schools have no fences. Waterfronts are walkable without railings. These design choices could feel risky elsewhere — but here, they reflect something deeper: a culture where people look out for one another.

When someone in our group asked about safety, the answer was simple: “If everyone is watching, no one can get away with something.”

It’s not just thoughtful urban planning — it’s a living example of how values shape environments, and how environments, in turn, shape behavior.

‍

Resilience grows from hardship — if you let it.

After the 1980s oil crisis nearly bankrupted the city, Copenhagen chose not to retreat — they doubled down on planning for the future.

And after the 2008 cloudburst caused billions in flood damage, they reimagined their urban infrastructure — creating parks and green spaces that also manage stormwater. It’s not just smart engineering. It’s a mindset: learn from the past, build for the future.

‍

Trust fuels investment — and investment reinforces trust.

In Copenhagen, we heard that people are willing to pay high taxes — not begrudgingly, but gladly. Why? Because they see the return: clean infrastructure, reliable public transit, social support systems, and a high quality of life.

It made me wonder: what happens when people trust their systems to reflect shared values? What might be possible if more communities could see — and believe in — the impact of collective investment?

‍

Culture shapes design — and design reinforces culture.

Denmark’s welfare-oriented, community-first values show up in everything from housing to transit to public space. That didn’t happen by accident — it came from generations of intentional planning rooted in collective care. (Emphasis on the fact that these things take time!)

It reminded me that design isn’t solely about aesthetics or function — it’s about values. And those values show up in the physical world, whether we realize it or not.

‍

These examples weren’t framed as “look how perfect this is.” In fact, one presenter even acknowledged that her version of Copenhagen might sound a bit like a fantasyland — especially to an American audience. But that humility made the message land even more powerfully: these aren’t utopias. They’re outcomes of long-term commitment, values-aligned design, and resilience.

Beyond Comparisons

During the trip, there were moments when people voiced a familiar frustration:
"Well, this could never happen in the U.S."

Whether it was about our federal government’s fragmented policies or our deeply individualistic culture, the sentiment was understandable — but, to be honest, a bit deflating.

Because yes, Denmark is a small, homogenous country with a long tradition of social welfare. The U.S. is vastly different — in size, in governance, in history. But I don’t think the point is to carbon copy Copenhagen.

And while it’s tempting to say, “Well, the U.S. could never do that,” I’m not sure that’s fair. Denmark is the size of a U.S. state. Their federal government feels more like local government in terms of closeness to the people. So maybe the better question is:

What scale are we talking about when we imagine change?

Because cities, states, and communities across the U.S. are making commitments and designing for the future — just not always in the same way.

It’s also easy to write off Denmark’s trust-based, welfare-oriented culture as something that could never take root here. After all, we have different histories. The U.S. is built on individualism. Denmark, on collective care.

But here’s the thing: individuals need community. And communities are made up of individuals. One can’t exist without the other.

So maybe that’s the lesson — or at least the reminder. That even in a country as large and complex as ours, culture is still shaped by daily decisions. And that includes the decision to act with care, to design with values, and to build with others in mind.

Questions Worth Asking

• ‍What values do we want our communities to reflect — and how can design help bring those to life?
  (And are we willing to prioritize them in how we build, fund, and maintain our spaces?)
• ‍Where in our own cities or communities are we already seeing glimmers of this kind of trust-based design?
  (What would it look like to amplify and build on that?)
• ‍What scale of change are we overlooking by focusing only on federal policy?
  (Could your city, neighborhood, or organization be its own version of a ripple?)
• ‍How do we balance our individualistic culture with the need for collective care?
  (And what small choices can we make that contribute to a healthier whole?)
• ‍What’s one thing we’ve been told “could never happen here” — that might actually be possible, if we reimagined the conditions?

A Week Well Spent

I left Copenhagen feeling full — of ideas, questions, inspiration, and, unexpectedly, a sense of calm. The city wasn’t perfect, and no one claimed it was. But it carried a quiet confidence, rooted in long-term investment and collective care.

And on our final day, a few of us closed the trip with a jump into the harbor.
Yes, the water was cold. Yes, I forgot a towel. Classic.

But it felt like more than just a fun way to end the week — it felt like a sendoff. Like we were jumping into something.

Into deeper questions.
Into the work ahead.

Into hard conversations.
Into the hopeful possibility that thoughtful design and community care can shape something better.

Into action, however imperfect—because waiting for perfect takes too long (and spoiler: that day’s never coming).

Because every leap — big or small — can move us closer to the future we want to build.